Privacy & Data Security Law Journal
California Supreme Court Limits Disclosure of Grand Jury Evidence to Civil Litigants
February 2009
The California Supreme Court in Goldstein v. Superior Court has clarified that California courts have no inherent power to order disclosure of grand jury evidence to civil litigants under circumstances that are not specified in the California Penal Code. Because the number of California county-level grand jury investigations is steadily rising, and it is increasingly common for grand jury investigations to precede or accompany civil actions for damages or restitution, California’s limits on civil litigants’ access to grand jury evidence have the potential to affect a greater number of civil litigation matters than ever before. This article explores the background of California’s limits on the disclosure of grand jury evidence, the Goldstein decision, and some of its practical implications for future California civil actions.
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Generative AI and Privilege: Practical Lessons from Two Early Decisions and What Comes NextFebruary 27, 2026Sidley Shortlisted at the Managing IP Americas Awards 2026February 13, 2026Sidley Secures Preliminary Injunction Against Oregon Packaging EPR LawFebruary 9, 2026Anderson v. Intel – U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari: Implications for ERISA “Excessive Fee” LitigationJanuary 26, 2026Two Sidley International Arbitration Cases Recognized on Law360’s “5 International Arbitration Cases to Watch in 2026”January 13, 2026Sidley Wins Major Ninth Circuit Antitrust AppealJanuary 13, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory