Daily Journal
‘Prior substantiation’ theory no good in consumer actions
June 17, 2015
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument this month in Arleen Cabral v. Supple LLC, a case accusing supplement maker Supple of falsely advertising its beverage product as clinically proven to “provide fast relief from joint suffering caused by ailments such as arthritis.”
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Massachusetts’ Highest Court Signals Willingness to Scrutinize State Wiretapping Laws and Knock Out Claims at the Pleading StageOctober 29, 2024Amendments to California's Automatic Renewal Law Set to Take Effect in 2025October 2, 2024Drip Pricing Exemption Isn't A Free Pass For Calif. EateriesJuly 31, 2024RILA Retail Law Conference 2023October 25 – 27, 2023Ninth Circuit En Banc Ruling Olean Creates Circuit Split Rejecting Bright Line Rule for Rule 23(b)(3) Predominance in Favor of Case by Case AnalysisApril 12, 2022Bruce Springsteen May Have Been Born in the USA, but What about His Levi’s?September 24, 2020
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory