The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument this month in Arleen Cabral v. Supple LLC, a case accusing supplement maker Supple of falsely advertising its beverage product as clinically proven to “provide fast relief from joint suffering caused by ailments such as arthritis.”
Daily Journal
‘Prior substantiation’ theory no good in consumer actions
June 17, 2015
联系方式
随时了解最新情况