Skip to main content
Privacy and Cybersecurity Update

Get Prepared for Data Privacy Compliance Under China PIPL

September 22, 2021

On August 20, 2021, China’s National People’s Congress passed the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), which will become effective starting November 1, 2021.

As an overarching law in China with respect to data privacy, PIPL shares many similarities with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). If a company has already been GDPR compliant, its data privacy compliance system can basically work in China, while certain localizations are necessary in response to unique requirements under PIPL. In particular, a company should pay attention to the following differences between PIPL and GDPR:

  • Data localization. PIPL requires a controller1 of large-scale personal data2 or a critical information infrastructure operator (CIIO)3 to store personal data within China, and cross-border transfer thereof shall be subject to a security assessment by Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC). Other data controllers may do the cross-border transfer in reliance on one of legitimate approaches recognized under PIPL, including entering into a standard contract (following a template to be issued by CAC) with overseas data recipients. Further, a controller shall obtain standalone consent of data subjects (to the extent that the consent is the lawful basis for the data processing) and conduct the data protection impact assessment (DPIA, as defined below) prior to the cross-border transfer.
  • Standalone consent of data subjects. Standalone consent is a unique concept under PIPL. The law requires a controller to obtain standalone consent of data subjects under certain circumstances, for example, processing sensitive personal data and cross-border transfer of personal data. Although PIPL does not define the “standalone consent,” it is commonly believed that such consent shall be obtained through a separate affirmative action by data subjects (e.g., a separate signature or clicking of a separate checkbox).
  • Rights of data subjects. Rights of data subjects under PIPL are similar to those under GDPR except that the “right to be forgotten” under GDPR is not provided under PIPL.
  • DPIA. Both GDPR and PIPL require the DPIA under certain circumstances, for example, automated decision-making and processing sensitive personal data. However, PIPL further requires a controller to conduct the DPIA in the following cases (which are not required under GDPR): cross-border transfer of personal data, contracting a third-party data processor, providing personal data to another controller, and making personal data publicly available.
  • Data breach notification. Unlike GDPR, PIPL does not set forth a specific timeline (e.g., within 72 hours) for a controller to notify a data breach to a government authority.
 

律师广告—Sidley Austin LLP 是一家全球性律师事务所。我们的地址及联系方式可在 www.sidley.com/en/locations/offices 查阅。

Sidley 提供本信息仅作为向客户及其他友好人士提供的服务,且仅供教育目的使用。本信息不应被解释或依赖为法律意见,亦不构成律师与客户关系。读者在未寻求专业顾问意见之前,不应依据本信息采取任何行动。Sidley 和 Sidley Austin 指 Sidley Austin LLP 及其关联合伙实体,详见 www.sidley.com/disclaimer

© Sidley Austin LLP

联系我们

如果您对本次 Sidley 更新有任何疑问,请联系您平时合作的 Sidley 律师,或