BNA Securities Regulation & Law Report
Corporate Scienter Under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5
Corporations are named as defendants in nearly every federal securities fraud case under 1934 Securities Exchange Act (‘‘1934 Act’’) Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. The most frequently litigated issue in Section 10(b) cases, especially at the pleading stage, is scienter, i.e., whether the plaintiff has pleaded facts raising a ‘‘strong inference’’ that the defendant—often, a corporate defendant—has acted with the required ‘‘intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud.’’ Yet, despite the importance of this question, the federal securities laws are mostly silent on how to ascertain the intent of a corporation or other business entity, and the courts, until relatively recently, have been hesitant to offer an explicit rationale for their treatment of corporate scienter. Even today, courts continue to describe this as an open issue even in Circuits where it has been settled in practice for some time—a reticence that deprives litigants and District Courts of needed guidance.
Reproduced with permission from Securities Regulation & Law Report, 46 SRLR 875, 05/05/2014. Copyright 2014 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Forecasting the Future: Prediction Markets in a Regulated WorldWednesday, October 7, 20262026 New York City Broker-Dealer Compliance Fall RoundtableTuesday, September 29, 2026Sidley Advises Sun Life Financial in Reinsurance and Asset Management Partnership With Wilton Re and Formation of Windsor Life ReAugust 26, 2026Wanna Make a Bet? What Businesses Should Know About Insider Trading and the Prediction MarketsAugust 2026CFTC Proposes to Codify Commodity Pool Operator Registration Relief for SEC-Registered Investment AdvisersAugust 21, 2026Sidley Represents Stone Point Capital in Acquisition of Ever.Ag’s Risk Management BusinessAugust 20, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory