Delaware Business Court Insider
Del. Courts Must Grapple With Efforts to Impose Fiduciary Duties on Investors Exercising Contractual Rights
December 12, 2018
The Chancery Court will continue to face novel theories of controlling stockholder liability based on contract rights, and Delaware’s ability to impose clear limits on when an investor’s contract rights render it a fiduciary to the company will have significant consequences for corporate finance and strategic investments under Delaware law going forward.
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Delaware Ruling Emphasizes High Bar to Pleading a Control GroupSeptember 11, 2026Court of Chancery Confirms No Price-Maximization Duty on Public Benefit Corporation DirectorsSeptember 8, 2026Strayed from the Path: Dodiya v. Franklin and the Emerging Rules of the DGCL’s Section 144 Safe HarborsSeptember 4, 2026Heightened Means Heightened: Chancery’s First Read of SB 21’s New Presumption Shuts Down Demand FutilityAugust 26, 2026Sidley Represents Rael in Its Strategic Investment from TowerBrook Capital PartnersAugust 24, 2026Mind the Gap: Delaware Court of Chancery’s Clarification of the Implied Covenant’s Contractual Gap-Filling RoleAugust 18, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory
