Employee Relations Law Journal
Sidley Partners Featured in the Employee Relations Law Journal, Autumn 2024 Edition
June 21, 2024
Numerous Sidley partners were featured in the Autumn 2024 edition of the Employee Relations Law Journal, a quarterly publication that provides senior human resource executives, in-house counsel, and attorneys with clear and authoritative articles on key issues and trends impacting employment law.
Wendy M. Lazerson, Katherine A. Roberts, and Natalie C. Chan wrote the article titled, “U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Standard to Challenge Discriminatory Job Transfers Under Title VII: What Employers Need to Know,” which examines a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that lowers the standard needed to challenge a job transfer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In this article, the Sidley team provides background on the relevant case, details the Court’s decision, and discusses potential implications for employers.
Benjamin R. Nagin, Laura Collins, Margaret H. Allen, Wendy M. Lazerson, Katherine A. Roberts, and Eric Kauffman wrote the article titled, “U.S. Federal Trade Commission Voted to Ban Noncompetes. What Happens Now?” which discusses the new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rule banning noncompete clauses in employment contracts. In this article, the Sidley team defines what is considered a noncompete for purposes of the FTC’s prohibition and which employees are covered by the new rule, as well as delve into the interplay between this new rule and other employment agreements, providing key insights for employers going forward.
View “U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Standard to Challenge Discriminatory Job Transfers Under Title VII: What Employers Need to Know.”
View “U.S. Federal Trade Commission Voted to Ban Noncompetes. What Happens Now?”
Wendy M. Lazerson, Katherine A. Roberts, and Natalie C. Chan wrote the article titled, “U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Standard to Challenge Discriminatory Job Transfers Under Title VII: What Employers Need to Know,” which examines a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that lowers the standard needed to challenge a job transfer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In this article, the Sidley team provides background on the relevant case, details the Court’s decision, and discusses potential implications for employers.
Benjamin R. Nagin, Laura Collins, Margaret H. Allen, Wendy M. Lazerson, Katherine A. Roberts, and Eric Kauffman wrote the article titled, “U.S. Federal Trade Commission Voted to Ban Noncompetes. What Happens Now?” which discusses the new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rule banning noncompete clauses in employment contracts. In this article, the Sidley team defines what is considered a noncompete for purposes of the FTC’s prohibition and which employees are covered by the new rule, as well as delve into the interplay between this new rule and other employment agreements, providing key insights for employers going forward.
View “U.S. Supreme Court Lowers Standard to Challenge Discriminatory Job Transfers Under Title VII: What Employers Need to Know.”
View “U.S. Federal Trade Commission Voted to Ban Noncompetes. What Happens Now?”
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Game Changer: What DOJ’s Antitrust Whistleblower Rewards Program Means for Corporate Compliance ProgramsApril 15, 2026Industrial Accelerator Act: A New Framework for EU (Sustainable) Industrial GrowthApril 9, 2026Sidley Helps Secure Appellate Victory for Princeton University in Ivy League Athletic Scholarships Antitrust Class ActionApril 6, 2026Sidley Represents Axsome Therapeutics in its Acquisition of Global Rights to Balipodect from TakedaApril 3, 2026Sixteen Sidley Partners Selected to Serve on Law360’s 2026 Editorial BoardsMarch 30, 2026Sidley Advises Shield AI on Acquisition of AechelonMarch 26, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory





