Skip to main content
Sidley Updates

Monetary Authority of Singapore Proposes Allowing Singapore Retail Investors Access to Private Market Investment Funds

April 8, 2025
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is conducting a consultation to seek public feedback on a proposal to enable retail investors in Singapore to access private market investments through Singapore-constituted investment funds authorized by MAS. This Sidley Update covers some noteworthy requirements that MAS is looking to impose under the framework. 

On March 27, 2025, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) issued a consultation paper on providing retail access to private market investment funds (Consultation Paper). The Consultation Paper sets out the regulatory parameters that MAS is looking to put in place to enable retail investors in Singapore to access private markets investments so as to diversify their investment portfolios.

The consultation comes in light of recent trends in various jurisdictions to allow or enhance retail access to private market investments. MAS has also received feedback from market players in Singapore on the potential growth in this space.

All interested parties are invited to provide their comments to the proposals in the Consultation Paper by May 26, 2025.

Long-Term Investment Funds Framework 

Under the Consultation Paper, retail investors will be able to access private market investments, such as private equity, private credit, and infrastructure, through long-term investment funds (LIF) that are constituted in Singapore and authorized by MAS under Section 286 of the Securities and Futures Act 2001 (SFA) for offers to the retail public (Authorized Funds). 

An LIF authorized by MAS can take the form of two possible structures: 

(i) Direct Fund: a Singapore-constituted fund that makes direct private market investments; or

(ii) LIFF: a Singapore-constituted long-term investment fund-of-funds that invests primarily in private market investment funds. 

The two structures are meant to cater to retail investors with different needs. A Direct Fund provides a retail investor with greater visibility of the fund’s underlying private market investment assets, whereas an LIFF structure is beneficial for retail investors who wish to tap into the LIFF manager’s expertise in selecting and monitoring an LIFF’s underlying private market investment funds (Underlying PMI Fund).

The LIF proposals in the Consultation Paper build on the existing regulatory framework for MAS Authorized Funds under the SFA. Currently, the regulatory framework for Authorized Funds do not allow for the authorization of funds that invest primarily in private market investments. The Consultation Paper seeks to broadly align certain aspects of the LIF proposals with the existing requirements applicable to Authorized Funds under the MAS Code on Collective Investment Schemes (CIS Code). At the same time, adaptations have been made to account for the characteristics of private market investments. 

The proposed requirements for LIFs as set out in the Consultation Paper will be in addition to the existing requirements applicable to Authorized Funds and their Singapore-licensed fund managers.

The MAS recognition criteria for offshore LIFs constituted outside Singapore are not the subject of the Consultation Paper. 

Summary of Key Requirements

The requirements MAS is proposing to put in place may be broadly categorized into three groups: (i) LIF manager requirements, (ii) LIF requirements, and (iii) disclosure requirements. 

We set out below a high-level, non-exhaustive summary of certain noteworthy requirements that MAS is considering to impose on the LIF and its manager. 

Subject

Direct Fund

LIFF

Manager Requirements

Requisite License

  • The manager should be a Singapore-incorporated manager holding a capital markets services license for fund management to carry on fund management business with all types of investors, including retail investors (retail LFMC).

Manager Expertise

  • Minimum assets under management and relevant experience requirements will be imposed.
  • MAS is seeking feedback on whether the requirements for a Direct Fund should be the same as for an LIFF, or different from an LIFF to account for more active involvement of a Direct Fund manager in exercising discretion over the investments of the Direct Fund.
  • The LIFF manager, together with its related corporations, should manage at least S$1 billion of the relevant private market investments.
  • The LIFF manager should have at least three full-time MAS-appointed representatives who are resident in Singapore, and each individual should have at least five years of experience in managing private market investments.
  • The team managing the LIFF should be experienced in managing the relevant private market investments.

Board Independence

  • A proportion of the board of directors of the Direct Fund manager or the Direct Fund, where it is constituted as a Singapore Variable Capital Company, should consist of independent directors.
  • None proposed.

Fund Requirements

Incorporation Jurisdiction

  • Singapore

Permissible Investments

At least two-thirds of the Direct Fund’s net asset value (NAV) should be invested in the any of the following:

  • Private equity companies that meet criteria such as having a minimum valuation, gross revenue, and operating track record.
  • Private credit investments that are senior, backed by collateral such as income-generating real assets, subject to protective covenants, or issued to profitable companies of a certain size and gearing limit.
  • Infrastructure assets that are income-generating brown-field assets.

At least two-thirds of the LIFF’s NAV should be invested in unlisted Underlying PMI Funds that meet the following conditions:

  • The Underlying PMI Fund’s investment strategy and approach is to be primarily invested (i.e., minimum two-thirds of its NAV) in long-term, illiquid assets.
  • The Underlying PMI Fund’s investment assets are directly managed by a manager separate from the LIFF manager.
  • The Underlying PMI Fund has other investors.

A LIFF may invest up to one-third of its NAV in liquid investments (elaborated below) and co-investments alongside its Underlying PMI Funds.

A LIFF may only invest in an underlying fund-of-funds if the latter invests directly in other single funds. Feeder funds that wholly invest in another fund and do not charge additional fees will not be counted as another layer of feeding.

The following liquid investments are permitted, subject to a one-third NAV limit:

  • transferable securities;
  • money market instruments;
  • eligible deposits;
  • other collective investment schemes currently permitted under paragraph 1.4 of Appendix 1 of the CIS Code that are listed for quotation and traded on an organized exchange or redeemable on a daily basis; and
  • financial derivatives for the purposes of hedging existing positions or efficient portfolio management provided that these are not used to gear the overall portfolio.

Prohibited Investments

A Direct Fund and LIFF may not:

  • use financial derivatives for purposes other than hedging or efficient portfolio management, whether directly or through underlying funds;
  • engage in any securities lending or securities repurchase transactions;
  • take direct or indirect exposure (in the case of an LIFF, via investments other than in Underlying PMI Funds), to property, including commodities, that are not capital market products, infrastructure assets, or (for LIFF only) real estate; or
  • invest directly or indirectly in vacant land.

Concentration Limits

  • A Direct Fund should not hold more than a certain investment stake in the underlying private market investment. No specific threshold has been identified in the Consultation Paper, MAS is seeking feedback on the threshold to be imposed.

An LIFF may not directly hold:

  • more than 30% stake in any Underlying PMI Fund; or
  • more than 30% stake in any directly held co-investments in real estate and infrastructure assets.

In addition, a Direct Fund and an LIFF should not invest in more than:

  • 10% of the total outstanding shares of any single entity or trust;
  • 10% of each individual issuance of debt securities of any single issuing entity or trust (or where debt securities are issued under a debt issuance program, 20% of each tranche subject to a limit of 10% of the overall program size); or
  • 10% of the money market instruments of a single issuing entity or trust.

Diversification

  • A Direct Fund’s aggregate exposure to a single underlying private market investment asset should generally not exceed a certain threshold. No specific threshold has been identified in the Consultation Paper, MAS is seeking feedback on the threshold to be imposed.
  • An LIFF’s aggregate exposure to an underlying infrastructure or real estate asset should generally not exceed 20% of the LIFF’s NAV.
  • An LIFF’s aggregate investment exposure to a single underlying entity and its group should generally not exceed 5% of the LIFF’s NAV.

In addition, the existing diversification requirements under Appendix 1 of the CIS Code will apply to investments in liquid investments. This includes (and is not limited to) the following limits:

  • Direct investments in transferable securities or money market instruments issued by a single entity should not exceed 10% of the Direct Fund or LIFF’s NAV.
  • Aggregate direct investments in, or exposures to, a group of entities through transferable securities, money market instruments, eligible deposits, and counterparty risk exposures arising from the use of over-the-counter financial derivatives should not exceed 20% of the Direct Fund or LIFF’s NAV.

Please refer to the Consultation Paper for full details on the requirements that MAS is proposing to introduce. A copy of the Consultation Paper is available here

Attorney Advertising—Sidley Austin LLP is a global law firm. Our addresses and contact information can be found at www.sidley.com/en/locations/offices.

Sidley provides this information as a service to clients and other friends for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or relied on as legal advice or to create a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking advice from professional advisers. Sidley and Sidley Austin refer to Sidley Austin LLP and affiliated partnerships as explained at www.sidley.com/disclaimer.

© Sidley Austin LLP