Law360
Class Action Litigation Trends Post-Italian Colors
November 3, 2014
Many practitioners believed the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision enforcing a class action waiver in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant spelled the death knell to consumer and employment class action litigation arising out of a contractual relationship. There, the Supreme Court held that a class action waiver was enforceable to preclude an antitrust class action. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan summed up the projected impact of American Express in her strongly worded dissent: “The monopolist gets to use its monopoly power to insist on a contract effectively depriving its victims of all legal recourse. And here is a nutshell version of today’s opinion, admirably flaunted rather than camouflaged: Too darn bad.”
Contacts
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
Update on English Legal Advice Privilege Following the Aabar Holdings v Glencore JudgmentMay 20, 2026Sidley Advises Big 12 Conference on Partnership With RedBird Capital PartnersMay 15, 2026盛德斩获2026年《金融时报》亚太创新律师大奖May 14, 2026Sidley Represents Rigel Pharmaceuticals in Exclusive Global License Agreement with Pfizer and Arvinas for VEPPANUMay 13, 2026Sidley Ranked in Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific 2026May 13, 2026When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight from an SDNY DecisionMay 11, 2026
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

