Is the End Really Nigh?

An Assessment of Oral Argument in the Chevron Deference Cases, and Projections of Possible Impacts Across the Regulatory Space

The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in two cases putting at issue the continued viability of the Chevron doctrine. Sidley's Regulatory Litigation group and leading appellate and regulatory practitioners discussed the Chevron cases' oral arguments before the Supreme Court, where the justices may be heading, how possible outcomes may impact various federal agencies and regulatory disciplines, and identified the key doctrines, precedents, and practices in each space that rely on Chevron.

Sidley’s Assessment of Oral Argument in the Chevron Deference Cases from Sidley Austin LLP on Vimeo.

Panel I | What we heard and where the Court is likely going.
David R. Carpenter, Moderator
Kwaku A. Akowuah
Tacy F. Flint

Panel II | Impact of possible outcomes on federal agencies.
Gordon D. Todd, Moderator
Brenna E. Jenny
Justin A. Savage
C. Frederick Beckner III
Rebecca K. Wood
Kenneth W. Irvin
Matthew D. Lerner
David S. Petron
Raymond A. Atkins Ph.D.

Sidley Austin LLP is an Approved Accredited Provider of CA, IL, and NY CLE credit.
This program has been approved for CLE credit in the following jurisdictions:

CA – up to 1.5 General Credit (participatory)
IL – up to 1.5 General Credit
NY – up to 1.5 Professional Practice Credit (non-transitional/appropriate for experienced attorneys only)
FL, TX & VA – Applied Upon Request

CLE credit for on-demand viewing is not available watching the above video. Please contact MCLETeam@sidley.com to learn how you may access our CLE portal and obtain credit for this program.

To provide feedback or to obtain a copy of the CLE form please contact dcevents@sidley.com.