Commercial Litigation and Disputes and Consumer Class Actions Update
California Court of Appeal JustAnswer Decision Provides Important Reminders for Creating Binding Online Arbitration Agreements
The Court of Appeal held that JustAnswer could not compel arbitration because its sign-up process did not contain sufficiently conspicuous disclosures of the mandatory arbitration clause to bind plaintiffs. When plaintiffs first accessed JustAnswer’s website, they were presented with a box to type a question for response by an “expert,” clicked “Continue,” and were taken to a payment page containing a form for submitting credit card information. Below the form was a button for “Start my trial,” and below that button an additional disclaimer read, “By clicking ‘Start my trial’ you indicate that you agree to the terms of service and are 13+ years old.” The underlined “terms of service” was a hyperlink that led to another webpage with approximately 26 pages of terms, including a binding arbitration clause and class action waiver. Plaintiffs were not required to actually view the hyperlinked terms of service to begin using JustAnswer’s service and were automatically enrolled in a monthly membership by clicking “Start my trial.”
In finding that the notices on JustAnswer’s “Start my trial” screens were not sufficiently conspicuous to provide plaintiffs with inquiry notice, the Court of Appeal emphasized that “the onus must be on website owners to put users on notice of the terms to which they wish to bind consumers” and highlighted, among other factors, the format and placement of the disclosure of the terms of service outside of the area where customers would likely be focused. The Court of Appeal reasoned that, because the disclosure appeared below the payment form outside of the user’s primary area of focus, was written in small type, lacked contrast to make the disclosure apparent, and did not present the terms of service to draw the user’s attention, JustAnswer did not provide sufficiently conspicuous notice of the terms to create a binding arbitration agreement.
JustAnswer reaffirms the importance of obtaining customers’ assent to an online contract and is a reminder of certain key principles for providing conspicuous disclosures:
- Place the disclosure in close proximity to the button customers must click to complete a transaction (e.g., above the button).
- Expressly preview the arbitration clause in the disclosure referencing the terms of service.
- Where possible, require customers to check a box to affirmatively indicate assent to the terms.
弁護士広告—Sidley Austin LLP はグローバルな法律事務所です。当事務所の所在地および連絡先情報は、www.sidley.com/en/locations/offices に掲載されています。
Sidley は、本情報をクライアントおよび関係者の皆様へのサービスとして、教育目的のみに提供しています。本情報は、法的助言として解釈または依拠されるべきものではなく、また弁護士と依頼者の関係を生じさせるものでもありません。読者は、専門家の助言を求めることなく本情報に基づいて行動すべきではありません。Sidley および Sidley Austin とは、www.sidley.com/disclaimer に記載のとおり、Sidley Austin LLP およびその関連パートナーシップを指します。
© Sidley Austin LLP
お問い合わせ
この Sidley Update に関してご質問がある場合は、通常ご担当されている Sidley の弁護士、またはご連絡ください。
Offices
Capabilities
Suggested News & Insights
- Stay Up To DateSubscribe to Sidley Publications
- Follow Sidley on Social MediaSocial Media Directory

